Last Date of Paper submission- 30 July 2024 (Vol: 1, Issue: 7, July 2024)

Reviewers Guidelines (PIJST.COM)

Procedure International Journal of Science and Technology (PIJST) is the leading high quality International open access, peer-reviewed and refereed, follow UGC Journal guidelines, multidisciplinary, Multilanguage and monthly published online research journal. PIJST invited for Editorial/Reviewer Board Member. The quality of the journal is very important as a foundation for the research world of scholars and academicians. Keeping these things in mind, PIJST journal invites professional scientists, subject experts and excellent researchers from all over the world as editors/reviewers to ensure the quality of the journal's publication. Subject experts and excellent researchers meeting the following qualifications and experience can join us to help PIJST Journal gain global recognition.


Editorial/Reviewer Board Requirements:

  • The applicant should be a PhD (Doctorate) holder and should be working on the post of Assistant Professor/ Associate Professor/ Professor in a recognized Institute/ University. Or The applicant should be Master's degree with an experience of 10 Years as an Assistant Professor (UGC Norm) in any institution/University.
  • The applicant must have good experience in his/ her specific research field.
  • Applicant should have at least 5 research papers published in international journals/conference proceedings.
  • affiliation (department, and institution).


If you are interested, please join as a reviewer or by send your updated CV to: editor@pijst.gmail.com
After the approval of the Editorial Committee, we will notify you as soon as possible and add your profile to our Editorial/Reviewer Board.


The Responsibility of the Peer Reviewer:

The peer reviewer shall have responsibility for critically reading and assessing the manuscript in their specific field of expertise, then giving an author's opinion with respect to his submission as well as truthful feedback. The article's strengths and weaknesses should be discussed by the peer reviewer with a view to ways of improving its strength and quality, evaluation of relevance and originalness in the manuscript.

Please consider the following before reviewing manuscript:

  • If you have received any research paper/ manuscript which is not related to your area of expertise, please inform it to the editor immediately and also recommend an alternative reviewer to the editor.
  • Review of any research paper/ manuscript should be completed within 2 weeks. If you are unable to review within the deadline due to unavoidable reasons, please inform the editor and also suggest an alternative reviewer if possible.
  • Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers/ manuscript confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  • Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which there is a conflict of interest between the authors, the company, or the institution that is clearly related to the research paper/ manuscript.